Remove safe remove #139824
Merged
Remove safe remove #139824
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
…chenkov Remove safe remove `safe_remove_dir_all` and `safe_remove_file` use `canonicalize` to workaround a `MAX_PATH` limitation. However, this has not been needed in a long time, since the standard library handles this situation itself. I've kept `safe_remove_file` (without `canonicalize`) because it also returns `Ok` if the file is not found. While, `safe_remove_file` is only used twice, matching on the error kind is sufficiently verbose that maybe it's still worth it?
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#138906 (Reject test executables when not supported by target) - rust-lang#139818 (Normalize ADT field in `find_tails_for_unsizing`) - rust-lang#139819 (Use `rust-cache` to speed-up `citool` compilation) - rust-lang#139824 (Remove safe remove) - rust-lang#139859 (CI: rename MacOS runner) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#138455 (`librustdoc`: more `impl fmt::Display`) - rust-lang#139818 (Normalize ADT field in `find_tails_for_unsizing`) - rust-lang#139819 (Use `rust-cache` to speed-up `citool` compilation) - rust-lang#139824 (Remove safe remove) - rust-lang#139848 ( Reduce kw::Empty usage, part 5) - rust-lang#139859 (CI: rename MacOS runner) - rust-lang#139877 (Add warning comment to `Take::get_ref` and `Chain::get_ref`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139824 - ChrisDenton:non-canonical, r=petrochenkov Remove safe remove `safe_remove_dir_all` and `safe_remove_file` use `canonicalize` to workaround a `MAX_PATH` limitation. However, this has not been needed in a long time, since the standard library handles this situation itself. I've kept `safe_remove_file` (without `canonicalize`) because it also returns `Ok` if the file is not found. While, `safe_remove_file` is only used twice, matching on the error kind is sufficiently verbose that maybe it's still worth it?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
safe_remove_dir_allandsafe_remove_fileusecanonicalizeto workaround aMAX_PATHlimitation. However, this has not been needed in a long time, since the standard library handles this situation itself.I've kept
safe_remove_file(withoutcanonicalize) because it also returnsOkif the file is not found. While,safe_remove_fileis only used twice, matching on the error kind is sufficiently verbose that maybe it's still worth it?